Iodine-125 radioactive seed brachytherapy as a treatment for spine and bone metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ross University School of Medicine, Miramar, FL, USA. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA. Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT, USA. McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: shaleen.vira@utsouthwestern.edu.

Surgical oncology. 2021;:101618
Full text from:

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy, safety, and local tumor control of iodine-125 (125I) seed brachytherapy (BT) for the management of spine and bone metastases. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. Data regarding patient demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural parameters, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS Fourteen studies (7 prospective, 7 retrospective) were included, accounting for 689 patients, in our review. Analgesic efficacy was assessed at baseline and various postoperative time points. Significant improvement in pain was noted at 4- and 24-week follow-ups (p < 0.01). Interestingly, all studies that combined 125I seed BT with cement augmentation reported relatively higher levels of pain reduction (mean pain reduction ≥4 points) as compared to the studies which applied 125I seed BT as a stand-alone therapy (mean pain reduction ≥2 points), at the last follow-up. Local tumor control rates ranged widely from 14% to 100% at varying follow-ups. Median overall survival ranged between 10 months and 25 months. The overall complication rate was 19% (130/689) and mainly included minor subcutaneous hemorrhage, fever, myelosuppression, and seed displacement. Metrics assessing performance and quality of life demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to posttreatment. CONCLUSION 125I seed BT, alone or in conjunction with cement augmentation, may be a viable salvage therapy in appropriately selected patients. However, further studies are needed to analyze the long-term efficacy of this intervention as a palliative and curative modality.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis

Metadata